Update Home

2025-12-14 20:39:10 -05:00
parent 9aa57d71bf
commit d50d98f392

37
Home.md

@@ -44,7 +44,42 @@ GG as a field of science, as knowledge domain, then as with all knowledge domain
7. History: Historical Precondition 7. History: Historical Precondition
### 1. Language: Linguistic Precondition ### 1. Language: Linguistic Precondition
Languages of man are limited, but is capable of making true statements about God and His relation to creation. Particularly, who is to govern, how to govern, what to govern, when to govern, why to govern, where to govern. Languages of man are limited, but is capable of making true claims about God and His relation to creation. Particularly, who is to govern, how to govern, what to govern, when to govern, why to govern, where to govern. Language is often a representation of something in the external physical world, conceptualized in our minds. Hence, language will always be analogous, as in similar to what things actually are.
Hence, language is used to make coherent statements about God and creation to communicate concepts. Therefore all coherent statements are claiming to be true. Even when one seeks to deceive, it is claiming to be true.
Statements is either coherent or non-coherent. Cohereant statements are either true or false.
###2. Meaning: Semantical Precondition
The writing provides the objectivity of meaning.
Languages are leveraged to make truth claims. Truth claims are dependent on the objectivity of meaning.
YHWH has spoken. YHWH used language to communicate concerning himself and creation. Statement are made with words. Each word / lexicon has meaning conceptually pointing to an objective reality. The lexicon, the words and their morphemes, minimal units of language that represent meaning, all have meaningful concepts it communicates. The writing in totality is what provides the meaning.
As a born again believer, I reject "Conventionalism" theory that "all meaning is relative". If true, then every statement is relative, that it has no objective meaning, since it can mean anything relation to the one making the truth claim.
Writing of Ludwig Wittgenstein takes the equivocal position [ language is totally different from way god actually is ], non-analogous position to language. Similar to many demonically influenced PIM arguments, his writing are sophistry decoupled from the fundamental primitives of objectivity and makes the case at the higher social construct for language and meaning. Decoupled, his logic lays the semantical groundwork for more social manipulation.
### 3. Interpretation: Hermenutical Precondition
Objectivity of meaning on a concept, can be express in many ways. Objectivity of meaning can be found in the writing.
###3. Interpretation: Hermenutical Precondition